and maintenance or contributions to this blog, what with Facebook et al...
The cutting edges of something or other...
Overton and the political paradigm?
The Third Way taken to another dimension. What with the Balkanization of the presidential race.
CUT AND PASTE:
There is nothing wrong with being fiscally conservative. http://www.newsweek.com/.../jerry-brown-saves-california...
I don't have a problem with the claim that it is not progressive enough, we have to get progressives to run and not argue the lesser of two evils is wrong.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=s7tWHJfhiyo
The problem is what I call the Overton False Dilemma(formerly the Overton Psychopathy)
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=overton
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=third+way+dimension
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=paradigm
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=Trump
http://wonkette.com/607454/to-all-you-nimrods-losing-it-over-hillary-clintons-public-and-private-positions
SEGUE: wiki dump It's the filter.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBU665nuEmA
Seth Meyer Tapper Kaine Trump Hotdog..................... ^ nimrods.
Showing posts sorted by date for query race. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query race. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Thursday, October 13, 2016
Friday, February 13, 2015
Bane or Book
Many Republican candidates have book deals in this race.
Here Boehner shows his true colors and we can throw the book at him.
He is known for his tan or orange tint, while No Labels or Bridge candidates range purple.
But on The Ed Show this afternoon we can throw the purple at him.
Batter bather that's anarchist folks[!]
[tangent]
(Rubio, MM)
Here Boehner shows his true colors and we can throw the book at him.
He is known for his tan or orange tint, while No Labels or Bridge candidates range purple.
But on The Ed Show this afternoon we can throw the purple at him.
Batter bather that's anarchist folks[!]
[tangent]
(Rubio, MM)
Wednesday, March 26, 2014
I need to go on a diet of humor.
But now that I men shun it.
Y U ...
[Hint] /?
But seriously,^ I was pondering a fantasy race today(3-25), and polled a few people. Who would be a suitable candidate to run with Rand Paul, for a fictional set up of a Warren/Reich ticket? Unfortunately one suggestion blew my punchline: Dennis Kucinich.*
Maybe I will fill in the inspiration^^ for this ponder/poll later. Not that there is anything wrong with Hillary. It is more of a take on the Hope and Change^ that has happened.
* that was not the intent of my poll;
but then who am I ^^to advise R's.
D' Ribble: "you people..."? / Who gets it?
Chimp ! Temporal / Monkey Business / C/D / (Eye of Be)Holder Courage / QCON: TruthOut (a, b, c/d, e, f)
^ 3-26-14 i.e. later
^^ who am I to advise: Throwing the Game / Apples and Oranges?
Y U ...
[Hint] /?
But seriously,^ I was pondering a fantasy race today(3-25), and polled a few people. Who would be a suitable candidate to run with Rand Paul, for a fictional set up of a Warren/Reich ticket? Unfortunately one suggestion blew my punchline: Dennis Kucinich.*
Maybe I will fill in the inspiration^^ for this ponder/poll later. Not that there is anything wrong with Hillary. It is more of a take on the Hope and Change^ that has happened.
* that was not the intent of my poll;
but then who am I ^^to advise R's.
D' Ribble: "you people..."? / Who gets it?
Chimp ! Temporal / Monkey Business / C/D / (Eye of Be)Holder Courage / QCON: TruthOut (a, b, c/d, e, f)
^ 3-26-14 i.e. later
^^ who am I to advise: Throwing the Game / Apples and Oranges?
Sunday, March 09, 2014
The Battle of Milieu.
Rat race v Mises.
The Man versus the State(postscript)
[follow up 3-12-14]
Light Speed
NQSNL
TIP
wise crack
Bah bah bah bah bah a ram beau.
The Fourth Dimention of Twain
March of Times FOOTNOTE 2014 #ONE
Welch Rare Bit?
Re:visionism? [!]
[The Fourth Dimention of Twain
Un-Exceptionalism
The Physics of the DOW
Brook No Truck ?[!]
...(i,...k, l, m)
Re:Focus (n of 14)]
The Man versus the State(postscript)
[follow up 3-12-14]
Light Speed
NQSNL
TIP
wise crack
Bah bah bah bah bah a ram beau.
The Fourth Dimention of Twain
March of Times FOOTNOTE 2014 #ONE
Welch Rare Bit?
Re:visionism? [!]
[The Fourth Dimention of Twain
Un-Exceptionalism
The Physics of the DOW
Brook No Truck ?[!]
...(i,...k, l, m)
Re:Focus (n of 14)]
Monday, December 16, 2013
Hume or Mill...**
File(1) ? *(2)
*Not for Children
(1) Daily KOS Fox News Megyn Kelly Santa Claus Race Humor is No Joke
(2) (Slate) Santa Claus Should Not Be a White Man Anymore
(I put the context before the sleigh.)(Look a way[!]?)
Pour[^] Rudolf : In the spirit of accuracy this is even more disturbing. Does the South Pole have reindeer? I was hoping but unfortunately, it is another invasive meme. I was hoping that the image of reindeer pulling a sleigh with a jolly penguin would untie[*] the tongue-in-cheek and unite the world.
[^] = (sic)
[*] belated related inserts ? Not f ully parsed(i.e. red yet[!])
Edit note: links (1&2) relocated for sake of spoiler alert and timing thing ! ?
[In context ? ( ... ) ] better than festive us?
** emphasis (...) not the duality ofor files.(OW)
 |
| Slate St. Nick makeover* |
*Not for Children
(1) Daily KOS Fox News Megyn Kelly Santa Claus Race Humor is No Joke
(2) (Slate) Santa Claus Should Not Be a White Man Anymore
(I put the context before the sleigh.)(Look a way[!]?)
Pour[
[
[*] belated related inserts ? Not f ully parsed(i.e. red yet[!])
Edit note: links (1&2) relocated for sake of spoiler alert and timing thing ! ?
[In context ? ( ... ) ] better than festive us?
** emphasis (...) not the duality ofor files.(OW)
Tuesday, November 26, 2013
Pink Floyd
Post e. g.
Shades of Plato.
Knot too Cave.
Lost^ in Translation.
^ trans-something/not mogrify labelism
[The E Ron Crisis.]
From the bottomlineup!
tergiversate/Di-spencer with/the wall/social Darwinism.
BFT:(back from tangent^)
In the "corporations are people" and "government is bad" absolutist field, Kant we see that death to a country(read that the ideal of the name) is not death to a people(except if change is the enemy)^^. The act of saying/wiping any name off the map, does not mean people die, unless people die. Changing or wiping off a name is not an existential threat. Anymore than American describes a people, or Zion is a race or state. This can be seen in the poll(I speculate), that Iranians might hate America, but be more favorable to the people and other principles. It might also be seen in the take on Israel from True Torah Jews. But change is a threat to a part of us all. Even the name Zion has geographical and metaphysical branches.(Castle/Dry Land/Brook)
^^ context is everything and Mani-Hegelism; like might means maybe, and duality does not mean to exclude.
(too the moon!)
[Supply and Demand Myth] Supply more money and demand will increase. Oops that was too Economic. Demand must come from the bottom up, that is how the money gets created. Ironically or Mani-Hegelianistically answers don't come from above. The slippery-slope or domino theory are about the set up and playing the game, not the slippery game and knocking it all down.
Shades of Plato.
Knot too Cave.
Lost
[The E Ron Crisis.]
From the bottomlineup!
tergiversate/Di-spencer with/the wall/social Darwinism.
BFT:(back from tangent
In the "corporations are people" and "government is bad" absolutist field, Kant we see that death to a country(read that the ideal of the name) is not death to a people(except if change is the enemy)
(too the moon!)
[Supply and Demand Myth] Supply more money and demand will increase. Oops that was too Economic. Demand must come from the bottom up, that is how the money gets created. Ironically or Mani-Hegelianistically answers don't come from above. The slippery-slope or domino theory are about the set up and playing the game, not the slippery game and knocking it all down.
Wednesday, October 10, 2012
Ghost of X-mas Passed.
The Dickens*** you say?
Or Heckuva Charlie horse race?
Two Mitt or Not Two R's or 4F's.
Republicans too* Lucy the politics of us.
*If Romney does one more speech** he will be a Democrat, we will just have to guess which one.
** Haidt of sarcasm and parody.
*** kNOT! For image sake only, it is easier to drink a heading than lede a congress to water.
(Avast ye mixed Presidents Re:Reimagined [!])
Or Heckuva Charlie horse race?
Two Mitt or Not Two R's or 4F's.
Republicans too* Lucy the politics of us.
*If Romney does one more speech** he will be a Democrat, we will just have to guess which one.
** Haidt of sarcasm and parody.
*** kNOT! For image sake only, it is easier to drink a heading than lede a congress to water.
(Avast ye mixed Presidents Re:Reimagined [!])
Friday, October 05, 2012
Replacement Refs or Not...
If it were a debate* we would have stopped it.
Not to pun on Xfinity, but while the Comcast links*** will expire.**,
it's the congress John! Bring it on, Joe! The President needs to hold a Sit Down.
Before I get down to the task of preserving<*> those links whether read or not, I will explain the Rogue John and Wax Leak of the asterisks. Although the lesson learned from "Simon says"^^ might be to actually read links more thoroughly, the lesson from the Debate may be more complex but parallel of sorts. By "rogue",<*> I mean that former Presidential Candidate McCain(first link) confesses an expectation for him lowering the expectations of Paul Ryan, while disrespecting the Vice President and framing an expectation for gaffs. Then in regard to the " ball of wax " that Palin leaks, it connects the "boys" to the other "race" speech.^^^ (There, that's the GPS-uncross-Rhodes.)
And a far as my Tan Gents(Dr. Trumps), being a Seahawk fan has nothing to do with my take on the moderator. Well, who knows? But Mr. Lerrer has been critcized for not moderating or having a good performance, but I think that given the style over substance versus substance with style, these are not legitimate debates. And within the political system (such as it is) it was not his job to interfere with the players being themselves in order to let them make the proper contrast. Again having only heard most of the debate on the radio, I thought that the President walked away with it, but that was under the condition that facts matter. Neither he nor Lehrer could have done a better job in the case that they don't.
BTW^: Speaking of "boys", we have heard cracks about the Harvard "professor" and I suspect he has had to deal with a few wise-guys or gulls[!]
*if the link were fact checked...ditto.
(McCain goes rogue.)(Palin leaks ball of wax .)
** not that I have read them yet or the recommend them.
***The point of this lede and the heading...
^ apologies to literary geeks for my style over elements.(But that was Core Knell.)
^^ added in edit mode
^^^ to be expanded later(but see lede and stupid...I mean congress and John, Joe & Ryan. i.e. the context of the politics of "relief' legislation.)
[In the spirit of medium...? ]
[Not to parse too acutely, but it is the medium and the mess age.]
(Bu' dump 'ump [!] ... )
Re:Ouch?(see FLASHNOTE)
Post-Subjectivism? Might it be, rational subjectivism?
<*> 10-7-12(See FLASHNOTE: under construction)
<*> 10-9-12 slight edit ( "r.... ",)
Not to pun on Xfinity, but while the Comcast links*** will expire.**,
it's the congress John! Bring it on, Joe! The President needs to hold a Sit Down.
Before I get down to the task of preserving<*> those links whether read or not, I will explain the Rogue John and Wax Leak of the asterisks. Although the lesson learned from "Simon says"^^ might be to actually read links more thoroughly, the lesson from the Debate may be more complex but parallel of sorts. By "rogue",<*> I mean that former Presidential Candidate McCain(first link) confesses an expectation for him lowering the expectations of Paul Ryan, while disrespecting the Vice President and framing an expectation for gaffs. Then in regard to the " ball of wax " that Palin leaks, it connects the "boys" to the other "race" speech.^^^ (There, that's the GPS-uncross-Rhodes.)
And a far as my Tan Gents(Dr. Trumps), being a Seahawk fan has nothing to do with my take on the moderator. Well, who knows? But Mr. Lerrer has been critcized for not moderating or having a good performance, but I think that given the style over substance versus substance with style, these are not legitimate debates. And within the political system (such as it is) it was not his job to interfere with the players being themselves in order to let them make the proper contrast. Again having only heard most of the debate on the radio, I thought that the President walked away with it, but that was under the condition that facts matter. Neither he nor Lehrer could have done a better job in the case that they don't.
BTW^: Speaking of "boys", we have heard cracks about the Harvard "professor" and I suspect he has had to deal with a few wise-guys or gulls[!]
*if the link were fact checked...ditto.
(McCain goes rogue.)(Palin leaks ball of wax .)
** not that I have read them yet or the recommend them.
***The point of this lede and the heading...
^ apologies to literary geeks for my style over elements.(But that was Core Knell.)
^^ added in edit mode
^^^ to be expanded later(but see lede and stupid...I mean congress and John, Joe & Ryan. i.e. the context of the politics of "relief' legislation.)
[In the spirit of medium...? ]
[Not to parse too acutely, but it is the medium and the mess age.]
(Bu' dump 'ump [!] ... )
Re:Ouch?(see FLASHNOTE)
Post-Subjectivism? Might it be, rational subjectivism?
<*> 10-7-12(See FLASHNOTE: under construction)
<*> 10-9-12 slight edit ( "r.... ",)
Friday, September 14, 2012
Politics is local?
Ground Game ? *
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/an-embassy-statement-a-tweet-and-a-major-misunderstanding/2012/09/12/a2d32a8c-fd24-11e1-b153-218509a954e1_blog.html
http://open.salon.com/blog/ted_frier/2012/09/12/losing_gop_in_denial_over_own_failures
http://www.salon.com/2012/09/10/why_i_left_the_gop/
http://www.salon.com/2012/09/12/mitt%E2%80%99s_shameful_libya_statement/
http://theweek.com/article/index/233148/the-death-of-an-american-in-libya
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/an-embassy-statement-a-tweet-and-a-major-misunderstanding/2012/09/12/a2d32a8c-fd24-11e1-b153-218509a954e1_blog.html
http://www.salon.com/2012/09/13/cairo_embassys_statement_what_went_wrong/
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032608/ns/meet_the_press-meet_the_press/vp/48959856/#48959768 ***
Not the usual MO.**
[ http://blog.seattlepi.com/seattlepolitics/2012/09/13/house-race-koster-opts-for-the-full-romney/ ]
*Scroll over is sufficient until [fn] and post /under-construction(also redux labels) R done.
** "well" not exactly [!]
*** dropped link [!]
[Unfinished read, refinished read.(perspectivism) Politics over war. Obama has made progress in foreign policy, but Republicans want to take it back. The wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Egypt, and Iran(an evolution) are the examples of diplomacy(d) over preemption. It all sprung from the 2000 election debacle, resistance to Clinton policy and the failure on September 11th with the supposed post-9-11 world. But it is spelled out in the perspective that we cannot expect to teach democracy or politics over there, without practicing it over here(^). I will refrain from further tangents or links on this post, but I will note that the two reads just mentioned also reflect a bit of a balancing act that is not nearly as cut and dry as it might be written. One of the key differences in the big picture that makes the previous administration a stand out failure in American History is the combination of the voodoo(b) economics(arithmatic/fuzzy math+fuzzy English) with the neo-con perspective of American Exceptionalism (which is not) exemplified by choosing a war without paying for it. The success that is so difficult is because politics is local except for them^(f). This is demonstrated by the current Radical Republican opposition(c) to the Arab Spring,^^^ which removed dictators and is allowing(a) for democracy that might not turn out to be to our liking. Bush said war is hard work, but just because you want to fight, does not mean that progress and peace(with diplomacy and politics) are not harder work, and more profitable. That is part of true exceptionalism.
^refrain from a bumber snicker]
9-15-12
(a) FOX wrong about Libya says McCain.
(b) Foreign policy is Bane of Politics: bankruptcy bailout business not an option in either.
(c) Loose lips? Republican Threat to National Security
(d) not! but whiney!
(^) ibid re^frain [see (d)]
9-17-12 (e) not embedded i.e. that's right, there is no (e)
Seriously [!] folks ?
[^^ Apologies for sarcasm, but there is a diversity of reliability in the perspectives/sources provided.]
[NOW^^^ w/Alex Wagner w/Martin Basher on America Abroad.^^ But natural track of changing the strategy for Romney of change or status quo. i.e. hijacking change and boogieman status quo. Cam-Pain not working, Obama not running.]
[There is an (f) ]
^^ viscous cycle of anachronism
^^^ then Martin Bashir (NeoMitt)(Mittastrophe of asterisked?)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/an-embassy-statement-a-tweet-and-a-major-misunderstanding/2012/09/12/a2d32a8c-fd24-11e1-b153-218509a954e1_blog.html
http://open.salon.com/blog/ted_frier/2012/09/12/losing_gop_in_denial_over_own_failures
http://www.salon.com/2012/09/10/why_i_left_the_gop/
http://www.salon.com/2012/09/12/mitt%E2%80%99s_shameful_libya_statement/
http://theweek.com/article/index/233148/the-death-of-an-american-in-libya
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/an-embassy-statement-a-tweet-and-a-major-misunderstanding/2012/09/12/a2d32a8c-fd24-11e1-b153-218509a954e1_blog.html
http://www.salon.com/2012/09/13/cairo_embassys_statement_what_went_wrong/
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032608/ns/meet_the_press-meet_the_press/vp/48959856/#48959768 ***
Not the usual MO.**
[ http://blog.seattlepi.com/seattlepolitics/2012/09/13/house-race-koster-opts-for-the-full-romney/ ]
*Scroll over is sufficient until [fn] and post /under-construction(also redux labels) R done.
** "well" not exactly [!]
*** dropped link [!]
[Unfinished read, refinished read.(perspectivism) Politics over war. Obama has made progress in foreign policy, but Republicans want to take it back. The wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Egypt, and Iran(an evolution) are the examples of diplomacy(d) over preemption. It all sprung from the 2000 election debacle, resistance to Clinton policy and the failure on September 11th with the supposed post-9-11 world. But it is spelled out in the perspective that we cannot expect to teach democracy or politics over there, without practicing it over here(^). I will refrain from further tangents or links on this post, but I will note that the two reads just mentioned also reflect a bit of a balancing act that is not nearly as cut and dry as it might be written. One of the key differences in the big picture that makes the previous administration a stand out failure in American History is the combination of the voodoo(b) economics(arithmatic/fuzzy math+fuzzy English) with the neo-con perspective of American Exceptionalism (which is not) exemplified by choosing a war without paying for it. The success that is so difficult is because politics is local except for them^(f). This is demonstrated by the current Radical Republican opposition(c) to the Arab Spring,^^^ which removed dictators and is allowing(a) for democracy that might not turn out to be to our liking. Bush said war is hard work, but just because you want to fight, does not mean that progress and peace(with diplomacy and politics) are not harder work, and more profitable. That is part of true exceptionalism.
^refrain from a bumber snicker]
9-15-12
(a) FOX wrong about Libya says McCain.
(b) Foreign policy is Bane of Politics: bankruptcy bailout business not an option in either.
(c) Loose lips? Republican Threat to National Security
(d) not! but whiney!
(^) ibid re^frain [see (d)]
9-17-12 (e) not embedded i.e. that's right, there is no (e)
Seriously [!] folks ?
[^^ Apologies for sarcasm, but there is a diversity of reliability in the perspectives/sources provided.]
[NOW^^^ w/Alex Wagner w/Martin Basher on America Abroad.^^ But natural track of changing the strategy for Romney of change or status quo. i.e. hijacking change and boogieman status quo. Cam-Pain not working, Obama not running.]
[There is an (f) ]
^^ viscous cycle of anachronism
^^^ then Martin Bashir (NeoMitt)(Mittastrophe of asterisked?)
Monday, August 13, 2012
The Hope'd4 Campaign
Or U-Turn Around.
The Romney campaign was trickling down beyond the pail, when Congressional Budget Chair Paul Ryan was selected as the VP candidate. The watch word is turn around. If it can't turn around its own rhetoric, wait... I am lost in a logical cul de sac. Lies, I mean. It needs to turn around its lies or it cannot turn around the country. I recognize the irony of not being able to turn around its lies or they would not have a campaign against President Obama. Much has been made by Romney about broken promises by the president, about not turning around the country. Politics comes in three shades. There is the politics of getting things done, there is the politics of partisan ideals, and there is the politics of winning a race. I like the geometry of it. But there is the darker shade of pail. The outright not being able to run on the record.
[update]
[Hardball: That's the Ticket, Not Saving VP Ryan. (E. W. ) Romney was for the Ryan Plan before he was against the Ryan Plan. Is it a share 'n angle? As VP Biden takes on Ryan, he will run from his past to confuse the Romney plan. ]
The Romney campaign was trickling down beyond the pail, when Congressional Budget Chair Paul Ryan was selected as the VP candidate. The watch word is turn around. If it can't turn around its own rhetoric, wait... I am lost in a logical cul de sac. Lies, I mean. It needs to turn around its lies or it cannot turn around the country. I recognize the irony of not being able to turn around its lies or they would not have a campaign against President Obama. Much has been made by Romney about broken promises by the president, about not turning around the country. Politics comes in three shades. There is the politics of getting things done, there is the politics of partisan ideals, and there is the politics of winning a race. I like the geometry of it. But there is the darker shade of pail. The outright not being able to run on the record.
[update]
[Hardball: That's the Ticket, Not Saving VP Ryan. (E. W. ) Romney was for the Ryan Plan before he was against the Ryan Plan. Is it a share 'n angle? As VP Biden takes on Ryan, he will run from his past to confuse the Romney plan. ]
Saturday, August 11, 2012
The Dream Race
With the Nightmare*Ticket.
* yet to fully digest
[Think Progress or vice verse us.]
8-13-12:
Paul Ryan, Seriously?
The Choice War?
So far having only read the Nichols & Durst pieces(today), they both seem understated. I should review how many of the previous links I have read so far.
Other not read. Morning Joe**.
The Today Show.
On Meet the Press and more still going.
Ditto the round table goes on.
CNN Your Money.***
**Portman crack
*** earlier catch (not)yet
[update]
[8-16-12 Retired use of Romney 2012 label. Now Romney/Ryan 2012 going forward.]
* yet to fully digest
[Think Progress or vice verse us.]
8-13-12:
Paul Ryan, Seriously?
The Choice War?
So far having only read the Nichols & Durst pieces(today), they both seem understated. I should review how many of the previous links I have read so far.
Other not read. Morning Joe**.
The Today Show.
On Meet the Press and more still going.
Ditto the round table goes on.
CNN Your Money.***
**Portman crack
*** earlier catch (not)yet
[update]
[8-16-12 Retired use of Romney 2012 label. Now Romney/Ryan 2012 going forward.]
Wednesday, July 25, 2012
Fear and Running
in the Republican Party.
It could be said that the 1st Amendment of the constitution kills more than the 2nd Amendment.
Amendment 1- Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Amendment 2- A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
I was going to go with "gunning" instead of "running", but I did not want it to suggest* a 2nd Amendment solution. But with Romney running on an ad that misunderstands English, that is only one bullet point to my argument. "You didn't build that." is completely out of context**. But out of context does not necessarily mean misleading.***
Post asterisks: The impact of the first amendment on what gets done has more impact on life and death than the fallacy that anyone is going to kill the second amendment.[**]
* b.s. (blog search) to be footnoted
** (no pun on con text but I need to replace[*] the Daily Rundown links)
*** not to suggest (not exactly)
[*] close enough for blog work
[**] There are very constitutional reasons for the political calculus of this rhetoric to influence and create reality. But from another dimention, NorMan GoldMan has a rhetorical rant (not not it) that could fit Romney's rhetorical style in a silly Obama ad that could decimate [***] the Romney race.
[***] Pardon the Palin term, but not her.
[Post bracketed asterisks: regarding the NG rant, "that" is not quite "it" but on target, in more ways than one. But in appreciation of the nature of our progress, it is not about any new legislation. It is not about obliterating the constitution or its amendments or even new amendments. Old taxes and legislation are always on the table, for all three branches of government, and the people are the deciders. C-heading and lede!]
[Follow-up of sorts. But first a note on "gunning" as a rhetorical term. I'm sorry I can't give proper credit, but it may be embedded in the links above. However, Lawrence O'Donnell, noting the Brian Williams interview of Romney was not my original follow-up, but may be on target (That is not a course.) Ouch. Guns don't kill people, people do. Find them(Ctrl F)? What about the law? Not for the silly season, or gatlin salad? And oh no, not atTax of the meta4rhetoric. I really think there is a problem with the use of Senator Thelma for Patty Murray, since she puts Boehnor at the wheel.]
[Transparency Destroyed?]
[Re-sorts of sorts... sort of, or not, of course. This was basically an exercise in logging some clips of some MSNBC shows.]
[My best to Wendy & Ed Schultz!]
[7-26-12: update and effect (label)]
[Scroll up to "Post bracketed"]
It could be said that the 1st Amendment of the constitution kills more than the 2nd Amendment.
Amendment 1- Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Amendment 2- A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
I was going to go with "gunning" instead of "running", but I did not want it to suggest* a 2nd Amendment solution. But with Romney running on an ad that misunderstands English, that is only one bullet point to my argument. "You didn't build that." is completely out of context**. But out of context does not necessarily mean misleading.***
Post asterisks: The impact of the first amendment on what gets done has more impact on life and death than the fallacy that anyone is going to kill the second amendment.[**]
* b.s. (blog search) to be footnoted
** (no pun on con text but I need to replace[*] the Daily Rundown links)
*** not to suggest (not exactly)
[*] close enough for blog work
[**] There are very constitutional reasons for the political calculus of this rhetoric to influence and create reality. But from another dimention, NorMan GoldMan has a rhetorical rant (not not it) that could fit Romney's rhetorical style in a silly Obama ad that could decimate [***] the Romney race.
[***] Pardon the Palin term, but not her.
[Post bracketed asterisks: regarding the NG rant, "that" is not quite "it" but on target, in more ways than one. But in appreciation of the nature of our progress, it is not about any new legislation. It is not about obliterating the constitution or its amendments or even new amendments. Old taxes and legislation are always on the table, for all three branches of government, and the people are the deciders. C-heading and lede!]
[Follow-up of sorts. But first a note on "gunning" as a rhetorical term. I'm sorry I can't give proper credit, but it may be embedded in the links above. However, Lawrence O'Donnell, noting the Brian Williams interview of Romney was not my original follow-up, but may be on target (That is not a course.) Ouch. Guns don't kill people, people do. Find them(Ctrl F)? What about the law? Not for the silly season, or gatlin salad? And oh no, not atTax of the meta4rhetoric. I really think there is a problem with the use of Senator Thelma for Patty Murray, since she puts Boehnor at the wheel.]
[Transparency Destroyed?]
[Re-sorts of sorts... sort of, or not, of course. This was basically an exercise in logging some clips of some MSNBC shows.]
[My best to Wendy & Ed Schultz!]
[7-26-12: update and effect (label)]
[Scroll up to "Post bracketed"]
Friday, June 08, 2012
Tony Baloney
Awaiting remarks by the President** on Jansing & Co.* it is not exacty sauce age making.
Appropriate follow up.
Job / Race .
NOW with... doom and gloom. If Romney wants to turn the country around, he doesn't get economics, private, public, or change. Keep the change! The Mitt-flop of stay the course of goose and gander.
* Tag Team
** White House
Appropriate follow up.
Job / Race .
NOW with... doom and gloom. If Romney wants to turn the country around, he doesn't get economics, private, public, or change. Keep the change! The Mitt-flop of stay the course of goose and gander.
* Tag Team
** White House
Thursday, June 07, 2012
Simon says...
Going Off Script* ?**
Material dialogue.***
* Jansing & Co. : Gov. Rendell(**) nails it!
(links to be added)
** Ctrl F "Speaking of PEG'd" line of links(4)
*** Redrawing Battle Lines (Pelosi letter.)
[There is no script, there is only politics. The job and the race.]
[related(?): not fully viewed posturing? hard work!]
6-8-12 TONEY BALONEY?
[ANACHRO-SEGUE: Scott Walker the Anti-Palin in terms of terms. Wisconsin is the Republican's Egypt. Raw Money(*) is America's Syria. The battle field is the point. Clinton and frank oh files of ge-oh-me-try. Neo-Pythagorean. Not exactly sauce age making. Nor pate cake.
(*) Romney
(**) oops (not there yet)
Material dialogue.***
* Jansing & Co. : Gov. Rendell(**) nails it!
(links to be added)
** Ctrl F "Speaking of PEG'd" line of links(4)
*** Redrawing Battle Lines (Pelosi letter.)
[There is no script, there is only politics. The job and the race.]
[related(?): not fully viewed posturing? hard work!]
6-8-12 TONEY BALONEY?
[ANACHRO-SEGUE: Scott Walker the Anti-Palin in terms of terms. Wisconsin is the Republican's Egypt. Raw Money(*) is America's Syria. The battle field is the point. Clinton and frank oh files of ge-oh-me-try. Neo-Pythagorean. Not exactly sauce age making. Nor pate cake.
(*) Romney
(**) oops (not there yet)
Thursday, March 15, 2012
March Madness
Normally this refers to Basketball,
which involves a tournament.
Get in the Republican race and you can have your debate.
Even Comedy Central or MSNBC, should not be considered as early round qualifiers for the Final Four.**
* The Colbert Report or No Labels is not the shame, but Olympia Snow did come up. Being an enemy does not make you a candidate or a debater, let alone a journalist.
**Who would compete in this evolution?[i.e. Who would stoop to taking Sarah Palin serious let alone qualified to debate. Not that that would qualify her to advance to a final debate round. There was so much C-rap here, I thought I would d'ribble the punch line. Wouldn't we love Palin to actually debate*** someone of her watch-ama gotcha?]
[But speaking of tournaments, I don't think the Raw Money Class wants to be facing Obama anytime too soon.]
*** Buddy Roemer has left the building. Not to mention Gary Johnson.(C-Hillary Link*/see "actually debate" links.)
[3-21-12 Robert Reich ponders run.]
Thursday, March 08, 2012
Breitbart Lives!
Not exactly the Starting Point, but Soledad O'Brien "clashes" with Big Journalism** Editor-in-Chief over "critical race theory" and a with-held video.
* not to single out or be overly critical of CNN or Soledad O'Brien, but they do seem to be competing for "fair and balanced" between the other two "news" networks. FOX is the veritable "you started it" network. The media was too liberal so they had to have a "fair and balanced" take on their reality. Making room for MSNBC as a counter force. CNN has the real challenge trying not to be either, but still news or journalism in a market environment.
*** promo(not found) for "Up" balances de Tocqueville's intent.
[BTW: if corporations are people, should they also have...reproductive rights? Please note that I self-edited the last(see cartoon) health reference. (i.e. founding mother of all probes or ultra-sounds?)]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)